From inside the experience.

Freedom in the Arts began in 2023, when two of us — Rosie Kay, a choreographer and founder of her own dance company, and Denise Fahmy, a senior arts leader and former Arts Council England relationship manager — found ourselves on the receiving end of the experience this project now documents. Rosie had stepped down from her own dance company in 2021 after voicing a gender-critical view; her colleagues either cancelled her, or slowly stepped away from supporting her work. Denise had taken Arts Council England to tribunal after a sustained campaign of harassment over the same belief — and won.

We started Freedom in the Arts because, after both experiences, it became clear there was no body channelling the concerns of arts leaders, no organisation prosecuting the case in front of the institutions in a position to act, and no infrastructure for the artists, venues and intermediaries who were quietly experiencing the same thing — the cancellations no one names, the invitations that stop arriving, the work that is never made and never seen. We are treating it as an emergency, because that is what it is. We hope that in five years' time Freedom in the Arts won't be needed.

"When my colleagues in the dance world either cancelled me, or slowly stepped away from supporting my work, the experience was brutal."

— Rosie Kay, Art Without Fear

What we believe

Artistic freedom is under attack.

Recent times have seen the rise of intolerance — a new set of moralistic and political attitudes which many institutions and activist groups have adopted as dogma. Art schools, galleries, theatres, dance and music stages, and film sets were once platforms that nurtured diverse ideas and contrasting perspectives. Today, many of these institutions actively discriminate against artists and audiences who do not subscribe to their views.

This intolerant activism is now an existential threat to the arts. It silences voices, narrows what can be said and made, and replaces artistic judgement with political conformity. The price is paid in work that is never made, performances that are never staged, and audiences who are never given the chance to encounter difficult ideas honestly.

We believe that the arts must be a place of free expression — for artists of every belief, identity and political position. We believe institutions must be governed by clear principles, due process, and a commitment to artistic merit, rather than by the loudest internal voice or the latest external campaign. We believe the silencing must be reversed, and the conditions for free creative work restored.

The advisory group

Nine figures backing the work.

Nine sector-recognised figures advise the project — across criticism, journalism, sociology, law, equality, and the academy. Their presence on this list is itself an institutional ask of the sectors they belong to.

  • Tiffany Jenkins

    Cultural sociologist, author and broadcaster — ArtReview

  • JJ Charlesworth

    Editor-at-large, ArtReview

  • Kenneth Cukier

    Deputy Executive Editor, The Economist

  • Simon Fanshawe OBE

    Co-founder Stonewall; founder, Diversity by Design

  • [Advisor 5]

    [Affiliation — pending verification from FITA's advisory page]

  • [Advisor 6]

    [Affiliation — pending verification]

  • [Advisor 7]

    [Affiliation — pending verification]

  • [Advisor 8]

    [Affiliation — pending verification]

  • [Advisor 9]

    [Affiliation — pending verification]

Full advisory bios on freedominthearts.com ↗
Support

Who funds the work.

Freedom in the Arts is funded principally by the DV8 Physical Theatre Legacy Fund — the legacy of one of the UK's most politically-engaged dance companies, now matching donations made before 31 July. Additional funding comes from Natalie Stone and Friends in the Arts, with significant contribution from the latter to the antisemitism strand of the research.

The 2026 report was co-authored with Prof Jo Phoenix at the University of Reading; it is hosted in the University of Reading Central Archive. Research collaboration, not commissioned report.